How to focus at wide apertures

How to Focus at Wide Apertures

Editor's note: This month only – you can buy two of my favorite ebooks, The Creative Photographer and Square, for just $7 each! Limited time only – click the links to learn more. Thanks for reading, Andrew

Back when I used EOS cameras my two favorite portrait lenses were the Canon 50mm f1.4 and 85mm f1.8. One of the reasons I liked these lenses is because of their wide maximum apertures. These let me take photos with shallow depth of field and beautiful bokeh (the photo below was made with my 85mm lens at f1.8).

Portrait of an Asian woman made with 85mm prime lens at a wide aperture

But care is needed when using the widest aperture settings on these lenses (or any prime lens). The depth of field is narrow and good technique is essential for focusing accurately.

Depth of field calculator

You can work out how much depth of field you have with any given camera, lens and aperture combination by using Depth of Field Calculator on the DOFMaster website.

For example, if you use a full-frame camera with an 85mm lens at f1.8 and focus on something one meter from the camera, then the total depth of field is just 1.35cm.

Now, think about what happens when you use autofocus in one-shot AF mode (I’m assuming that your camera is set to use a single AF point, selected by you, not multi-point AF or eye-detection AF).

• You press the shutter button half-way.
• The camera focuses on the subject, using the active AF (autofocus) point. Focus is locked at this point.
• You press the shutter button down all the way. The camera takes the photo.

If you’re taking a portrait all it takes is for your model (or you) to move slightly between the time the camera locks focus and the instant you take the photo to shift the zone of sharpness away from her eye and onto another part of her face.

This matters, because when it comes to portraits, focus is very important. Most photographers focus on the model’s eyes, or the eye nearest the camera if her face is at an angle (this is just a guideline, and there are exceptions, but it holds true most of the time).

It’s easy to tell if focus isn’t precise, especially at 100% magnification. Take a look at these two examples to see what I mean. The first is an enlargement of the opening photo, showing the model’s eye in focus. The second is a photo taken a few seconds later, showing her eye out of focus (both photos taken using an 85mm lens at f1.8).

Close-ups of woman's eye in portraits showing how important accurate focus is

Center AF points

There was a time when many cameras had just one AF point, in the center of the camera’s viewfinder. Now, most photographers know that composition is usually better when the subject is placed off-centre. So, to focus with just one AF point, the accepted technique was to cover the subject with the AF point, press the shutter button half-way down to lock focus, then recompose and press the shutter button all the way down to take the photo.

This is fine – until you use wide apertures. A little trigonometry reveals why. Let’s go back to the above example of focusing with my 85mm lens set to f1.8 on something that is one meter from the camera.

Let’s say that you use the centre AF point to focus, then move the camera left to recompose. Doing so increases the distance slightly between your camera and the subject. It also tilts the plane of focus slightly (see diagram below). Add in the fact that it’s difficult to move the camera, even slightly, without moving your body position and it’s now unlikely that your lens is still focused on the model’s eye.

Diagram showing effect of locking focus and recomposing on accurate focus

Diagram: The white lines indicate the distance between camera and subject, and the red lines the plane of focus.

Other AF points

Taking all this into account it’s clear that the best way to focus on the model’s eye is to select the closest AF point, depending on the way you have composed the portrait.

But in practice it’s not so simple. For example, when I used my Canon EOS 5D Mark II for portraits I found that the center AF point was much more accurate than the eight outer ones. The reason for this is that the center AF point is a high-precision cross-type AF sensor, and the others aren’t.

Let’s look at this in more detail, because it’s relevant to any digital SLR camera using phase detection autofocus. This is the type of autofocus used by the camera when you take photos while looking through the viewfinder.

Contrast detection autofocus, used by digital SLRs in Live View and by mirrorless cameras, is different, as we shall see further on in the article.

Cross-type AF sensors

The centre AF point on my EOS 5D Mark II is a cross-type AF point. Cross-type AF sensors are sensitive to lines that move both vertically and horizontally across the frame. This diagram shows the camera’s autofocus array.

Canon EOS 5D Mark II AF points diagram

The other eight are single line sensors (the diagram below shows the difference). They are sensitive to lines that move across the frame in a single line. There are both vertical line sensitive sensors and horizontal line sensitive sensors. It is rare for camera manuals to indicate whether a single line AF sensor is a vertical or horizontal line sensor.

Diagram showing cross-type and single line AF points

Once I realized that the center AF point on my camera was more accurate than the others I decided to test it properly. I took five portraits at f1.8 with my 85mm lens using each of the camera’s nine AF points. The center AF point focused on five out of five accurately. It rarely missed focus. The others tended to focus just one or two times out of five accurately. This is not good enough. It’s frustrating to capture a great expression only for it to be out of focus.

The end result of this is that on my EOS 5D Mark II I was forced to use the center AF point for portraits. This led to compositions where I ended up placing the model’s eye in the center of the frame.

Here’s an example.

Portrait of an Asian woman made with 85mm prime lens at a wide aperture using center cross-type AF point

If I wanted to place her eye off-center, like this portrait, I had to take several photos to try and ensure one was sharp.

Portrait of an Asian woman made with 85mm prime lens at a wide aperture using 0ff-center single-line AF point

More cross-type AF sensors

Now, wouldn’t it be helpful if there was more than one cross-type AF sensor on my camera? Yes, it would. Bear in mind the 5D Mark II was released in 2008. In digital terms it’s an old camera. All the latest Canon cameras have multiple cross-type AF points. So do all the latest cameras from every other manufacturer. So it’s not the problem that it once was.

The main point I’d like to make is that it’s important to understand how your camera’s autofocus system works when using prime lenses at wide apertures. Especially for portraits, where focus is critical. Once you understand this, you can adjust your technique accordingly, as I did when composing portraits.

It also helps you understand when you might need to upgrade to a more advanced camera. If you’re constantly bumping up against a limitation of your camera (like I was), then you should consider upgrading. But only once you’ve determined that it’s a genuine limitation of the camera and not your lack of understanding of how it works that’s causing the problem.

Back and front-focusing

I hate to throw another thing at you but it’s also possible that your lens isn’t focusing precisely where your camera thinks it is. This is another limitation of phase detection autofocus systems. I’ll avoid an in-depth explanation of this for the moment, but all you really need to know is that your lens may be focusing slightly in front of or slightly behind of the point where the camera thinks it is focused.

This is not a fault of your lens or your camera, even though it may seem like it at first. It just happens because phase detection autofocus isn’t always as precise as you might need it to be. It’s fast – which is why digital SLRs are still the best tool for photographing fast moving action. But it’s not completely accurate.

Using the example above again, if you focus an 85mm lens set to f1.8 at a point one meter from the camera then you only have 1.35cm of depth of field. If your lens is actually focusing a centimeter behind or in front of that point, you have a problem. It reduces your margin for error dramatically, and you are more likely to have out of focus images through no fault of your own.

Most mid and high end SLR cameras let you tweak the autofocus settings to compensate for this.

This is called Autofocus micro-adjustment by Canon and Sony. Nikon calls it Autofocus fine tune, Pentax uses the term Autofocus adjustment and Olympus Autofocus focus adjust.

Sigma even makes a dedicated USB dock that lets you compensate for focusing errors by updating the lens’s firmware.

Unfortunately most consumer digital SLR cameras don’t have this feature. The only way to adjust the autofocus performance of a prime lens is to take the camera and lens to a technician.

Professional photographers who qualify for Canon Professional Services or Nikon Professional Services can work with those companies’ technicians to fine tune the autofocus systems of their cameras. Both companies send technicians to major sporting events to help out with this.

Contrast detection autofocus

Does this sound like a lot of hassle? It is, and you may be interested to learn there is a better way of doing things. Mirrorless camera owners will know exactly what I’m referring to.

Mirrorless cameras use contrast detection autofocus instead of phase detection autofocus. Actually, more and more cameras use a combination of the two, but contrast detection autofocus is the one we’re interested in from the point of view of focusing accurately at wide apertures.

With contrast detection autofocus the camera reads exposure from the sensor. The advantage of this is accuracy. With my Fujifilm X-T1 I can set my 56mm lens to f1.2 and select any of its 49 autofocus points knowing that it’s going to focus accurately virtually every time.

I tested the X-T1’s autofocus accuracy with the portrait below. I deliberately composed the photo so that there were twigs and leaves between the camera and the model. It still had no trouble focusing accurately on her eye.

Portrait of a woman made with prime lens at a wide aperture

The disadvantage is speed. Contrast detection autofocus is slower than phase detection autofocus. The result is that it’s less likely to be accurate when tracking moving subjects. Some mirrorless cameras use a hybrid of both to improve autofocus tracking performance.

Contrast detection autofocus is also used by digital SLRs in Live View (again, some cameras use a mix of contrast detection and phase detection to enable tracking of moving subjects, especially for shooting video footage).


I’ve thrown a lot of information at you in this article, so let’s take a few moments to sum up what you need to know.

To focus accurately on still subjects with prime lenses at wide-apertures you need to use either a digital SLR with plenty of cross-type autofocus points or a mirrorless camera. You may also need to adjust the focusing point of lenses used with digital SLRs.

Mirrorless cameras with contrast detect autofocus don’t have this problem. For this reason they are great to use for portraits. There is no need to worry about which AF points are cross-type points, or whether you need to calibrate your lenses. You can just get on with it, knowing that your camera is going to focus accurately.

If you own a digital SLR it’s a little more complex. Take the time to test your camera and lens combination, much like I did with my EOS 5D Mark II. Learn how to select cross-type AF points, and do some tests to see if your lens is back or front-focusing. Once you have established the facts, you will know which AF points are reliable.

The key is to get to know exactly how your camera and lens combination works so you can trust it when shooting portraits. Or any other type of photo that requires accurate focusing at wide apertures with prime lenses.

If you have any questions about any of this then please let us know in the comments.

Further reading

Introducing Lightroom Classic ebookThanks for reading. You can get more great articles and tips about photography in my popular Mastering Photography email newsletter. Join today and I’ll send you 47 PhotoTips cards and my ebook Introducing Lightroom Classic . Over 30,000 photographers subscribe. Enter your email now and join us.

Lenses in photography

About Andrew S. Gibson

Andrew S. Gibson is a writer with a camera. He started writing about photography while traveling in Bolivia, and has been published in many prestigious photography magazines including EOS magazine, where he worked as a Writer and Technical Editor for two years. He lives in south Devon in the UK and is inspired by meeting new people, seeing new places and having new experiences. Check out his photography ebooks here.


  1. Interesting article on auto-focus methods. You refer several times to prime focus lenses at wide apertures. What changes with zoom lenses?

    1. Author

      Not much. The same techniques still apply, but focusing isn’t as critical because you have more depth of field. If you’re using a zoom your widest aperture is going to be f5.6, f4 or f2.8, not f1.8, f1.4 or f1.2 as it would be with a prime. The more you stop down, the less relevant focusing techniques become.

  2. You can also use manual focus along with focus peaking. I often use DMF which is a auto/manual hybrid focusing mode and red as my peaking color. When the eyes turn red, I know they are in focus.

    1. Author

      Yes you can, if you have a mirrorless camera with an electronic viewfinder. Personally I find that using manual focus with focus peaking on my X-T1 is not as accurate as using autofocus. It’s also slower. But focus peaking on your Sony camera may work better. Or you may just have mastered it better!

  3. A well written article on auto focusing. Could you next time write about how the focusing system ranges even though you think you lens should lock on a subject matter? Drives me nuts some times. I have run into an interesting thing as I have a full manual f/2.8 lens on my D700. Switching the camera over to full manual for f/stop – shutter speed, has left me with out the ability to use the auto focusing. I am finding that even stopping down two stops on a 180mm lens it still has a very small depth of field, creating a great bokeh effect but so many of my images are of soft focus. It has been years since I used a manual lens and I am finding that it is like going back to school to use it.

    1. Author

      Hi Christopher, I guess it’s partially covered in the article. I’ve written about cross-type AF sensors as being more accurate than single line sensors, which they are. But they are also better at locking focus in low light or low contrast conditions which make single line AF sensors hunt. If you’re having a problem with your autofocus not locking on properly try using your camera’s cross-type AF sensors. Your camera’s manual should tell you how to do it.

      You’re right, manual focus lenses are hard to use, especially on a digital SLR. Mirrorless cameras are better because they have more tools to help you focus accurately. There’s no easy solution for your focusing problems on your camera, other than use an autofocus lens. Or use a smaller aperture, but then you lose the bokeh.

  4. Hi Andrew – this is a subject that is very dear to my heart – it’s a way of taking various shots that I’ve been playing with for some time.

    I did run into head winds, though, a year or so back. I had bought two of the Sigma ART lenses (the 50mm and the 24mm). The 50mm was fine, but the 24mm had dreadful focus problems. I tried everything I could think of, including Sigma’s USB dock, taking it to various shops catering for professional photographers, and trying to sort the focus adjustment necessary to get the lens to perform as it should have. On my D810, on the Autofocus fine tune, the maximum possible adjustment is ±20, and I had to wind it up to 19 to get any reasonable result. In the end I ditched it – it was all too hard – and dropped about $500 in the process.

    I have since done something similar to what you describe in your article, using my current (28mm) w/angle to take a macro shot of a flower. It gave just the right DoF and a great out of focus background beyond that.

    1. Author

      I bought a couple of Sigma lenses for my Canon cameras and came to the conclusion they weren’t as good as Canon lenses. But the Art lenses are meant to be better. The 24mm lens does seem to have a problem with calibration – I came across several references to it on Google. It’s surprising how something as simple as buying a lens can get so complex!

Leave a Comment